like first name
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
like magnets
isaac newton
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
god being the centre magnet
you cannot feed someone truth
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
autonomy of learning
as in
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
i love it here
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
Hours staring at the ceiling, the wall, curling up into a ball. It seems annoyed with the light, it kind of recoils. It will get lighter. I wonder where it goes in the day.
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
⚠️ Live Document Forever ⚠️
Wed, 11 Nov 2025 21:12:41
One of the birds shoots out of the tree.
there's probably something in that, but I don't feel like thinking about it too much yet.
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
I am below everything.
so the method has to be autonomous
no longer writing in the third person