i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

autonomy of learning

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

lol yea

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

much more tactility

lol

division of reality is straying away from it

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

idk

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

your feed looks like my tumblr

Garden Post-Dusk, Birds Above, In Another Life

Better Lift

Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46

i have read not even 1 book

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

so an active mazelike process

Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:27:13

as in

FOUNDING DOCUMENT

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

...