there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i really havent
that looks like my instagram account
i was tempted to lie about my name
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
not their contents
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
propensity within someone
like first name
sorry i am texting like a slav
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
bro i read nothing in my life
is this you as well
its good
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
magnetisation/form
division of reality is straying away from it
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
isaac
i love it here
and the fake qualifier
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
its good
feel you
yeah
what do you mean
no i haven't really read anything
much more tactility
which magnetises chains of pins
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
yeah