hello reader,
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
much more tactility
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
its performative
and the fake qualifier
ahnaf abrar
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i really havent
not their contents
which magnetises chains of pins
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
god being the centre magnet
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
plato
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
no like which do people call me
so the method has to be autonomous
i dont understand magnetisation
what do you think my name is
ion
all that is to say
not so on: yvf(wthw)