you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
all that is to say
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
we can only engage in such a way
ion
god being the centre magnet
whats your name?
not their contents
ahnaf abrar
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
plato
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
division of reality is straying away from it
send your tumblr
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
abrar?
isaac newton
lol yea
was it worth it
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
autonomy of learning
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying