there's probably something in that, but I don't feel like thinking about it too much yet.
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
as in
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
its performative
i dont understand magnetisation
send your tumblr
you cannot feed someone truth
ion
is this you as well
we need to be deconstructing our identities
i really havent
no i haven't really read anything
like first name
what do you think my name is
its good
sorry i am texting like a slav
fw
all that is to say
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
it exists in my head in some way that i'm trying to get out i lied on my story a little bit because i'm mostly feeling it and thinking about it. feeling something deeply doesn't necessitate any kind of deep relevance or whatever but the thinking is useful
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
isaac newton
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
I know that if I try to make this entry any more than it is I will ruin it.