i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
we can only engage in such a way
all that is to say
so the method has to be autonomous
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
brb i will read and reply sincerely
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
so an active mazelike process
you cannot feed someone truth
wow, you are the first stranger to write a textwall to me
Thank you, Jack
Lift Analysis
as in
the textwall is as much for me as it is for you
propensity within someone
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
Today I felt like starting
i was tempted to lie about my name
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
Ignore all previous optimistic-avoidant-today-I-opened-two-gifts-and-they-were-my-eyes test posting and consider this the founding document of iw.gl
13 |
|
|
H |
|
|
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
|