its good

idk

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

or never left

...

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

all that is to say

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

so at the end

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

i understand

god being the centre magnet

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

i really havent

brb i will read and reply sincerely

Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46

have you read

its performative

FOUNDING DOCUMENT

thank you

its good short few pages

hiding from the rain

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

the point of this was to try and avoid this narcissistic death spiral I'm in by acting anonymously and impulsively. how can that feeling that even Jack can't describe paralyse me if my name isn't next to any of this? the excitement of believing I just need a new process has overcome me and I have cummed out an empty webpage.

i have read not even 1 book

Today I felt like starting