its performative

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

so an active mazelike process

so at the end

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

thank you

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

your feed looks like my tumblr

what do you mean

sorry i am texting like a slav

its good

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

yeah

so the method has to be autonomous

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

and the fake qualifier

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

the site i am dreaming

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

was it worth it

wait what is that

...

Thank you for telling me that I'm failing to see how I'm reproducing the dynamics I'm trying to critique by only describing my Korean colleague / fresh meat and the black girl in relation to others and myself.

plato

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

you cannot feed someone truth

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

bro i read nothing in my life

plato