not their contents

i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

feel you

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

the textwall is as much for me as it is for you

brb i will read and reply sincerely

this will be about a slug

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

barren land

magnetisation/form

you cannot feed someone truth

propensity within someone

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

plato

Thank you, Jack

send link

and the fake qualifier

a lot of what i've been doing has been some imaginary screenshot or recording of his website, something that could be found within it

we need to be deconstructing our identities

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

we can only engage in such a way

what do you think my name is

fw

your feed looks like my tumblr

all that is to say

i really havent

is everyoneback on tumblr now

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

i was tempted to lie about my name

ahnaf abrar

i dont understand magnetisation