like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

its good

which magnetises chains of pins

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

autonomy of learning

division of reality is straying away from it

and the fake qualifier

The bird dives back into the tree. It shakes, some leaves fall.

Rain, starting

all that is to say

is this you as well

        13       |
                |
                |
            H   |
                |
                |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
                |

Wed, 11 Nov 2025 21:12:41

we can only engage in such a way

December 2025

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

something for the future. something to look at when this is more. I've been thinking about... whatever

propensity within someone

no i haven't really read anything

2 (actually index). two is company

Imprint, memory, impact, representation, impression

there's probably something in that, but I don't feel like thinking about it too much yet.