...

i understand

lol

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

no like which do people call me

all that is to say

yeah

so at the end

abrar?

division of reality is straying away from it

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

i was tempted to lie about my name

bro i read nothing in my life

we can only engage in such a way

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

so the method has to be autonomous

like first name

idk

i see a website though something that reconfigures or is mazelike

She says something that isn't really right but isn't really wrong. I'm not taking in their words any more, just their voices, trying to get a feel for whatever is going on between them. I'm imagining what it's like for them in this delicate situation, what I would say if it were me. She has that perfect upper-class accent, and she's using whatever upper-class tact that comes with it to navigate this. Style. They can't be together, but their voices are betraying them.

Thank you, Jack

i dont understand magnetisation

and the fake qualifier

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

        13       |
                |
                |
            H   |
                |
                |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
                |

really i want the internet

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

whats your name?

kind of mythopoesis