a version of this existed for a few months last year but it was static. it was HTML with writing and pictures and videos and sounds. i had this feeling that the code should be as important as the content, that structurally each piece in relation to each other piece shouldn't change, that the mazelike quality should emerge from me intricately arranging paths through it. like classic hypertext
it exists in my head in some way that i'm trying to get out i lied on my story a little bit because i'm mostly feeling it and thinking about it. feeling something deeply doesn't necessitate any kind of deep relevance or whatever but the thinking is useful
somewhere between instagram and chatgpt
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
you cannot feed someone truth
division of reality is straying away from it
barren land
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
plato
i dont understand magnetisation
which magnetises chains of pins
so an active mazelike process
is everyoneback on tumblr now
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
as in
god being the centre magnet
ion
like magnets
wow, you are the first stranger to write a textwall to me
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
or never left
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
much more tactility
have you read
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
i love it here
Lift Analysis
i am quite illiterate on producing technology
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
i understand
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
you have a beautiful account btw
plato