Style

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

magnetisation/form

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

idk

as in

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

barren land

isaac

bro i read nothing in my life

we need to be deconstructing our identities

no i haven't really read anything

like magnets

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

i understand

so at the end

wait what is that

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

bro i read nothing in my life

i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

send link

lol

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation


i really havent