i was tempted to lie about my name
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
have you read
somewhere between instagram and chatgpt
your feed looks like my tumblr
but it is in my head and am i compelled to realise it, so it is my silmarillion, my tempelos
it is hopeful
i dont understand magnetisation
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
its performative
what do you think my name is
but i respect your search
i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it
wow, you are the first stranger to write a textwall to me
i see a website though something that reconfigures or is mazelike
the textwall is as much for me as it is for you
what do you mean
no i haven't really read anything
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
autonomy of learning
plato
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
I'm trying to picture the scene inside, like I was trying to picture the scene in the tree.
its good short few pages
This is a website run by a narcissist who can't produce anything without the hope that it is seen and loved but can't act due to the fear of it being seen and hated. They immediately feel the need to ask Jack GPT to define whatever this feeling is in the hope that understanding it will mean control over it and control over it will mean that they can stop it.
it exists in my head in some way that i'm trying to get out i lied on my story a little bit because i'm mostly feeling it and thinking about it. feeling something deeply doesn't necessitate any kind of deep relevance or whatever but the thinking is useful
not their contents
and the fake qualifier