lol

feel you

as in

its performative

not their contents

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

division of reality is straying away from it

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

we can only engage in such a way

which magnetises chains of pins

its good

magnetises a pin

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

December 2025

and the fake qualifier

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then

ion

...

you know who you are. no more time, not like

1

Their voices are saying they haven't and shouldn't fuck but want to so bad, or have fucked and can't again but want to so bad, or something like that. Would this be easier if they were birds? Incel kind of question... I'm not following the conversation, but I'm still listening. He's talking in this slightly begging way. It's a way of talking that asks for pity, like he's already tried appealing to every other one of her sensibilities. Incel kind of observation... Maybe he just talks like that, in some upspeak derivative. Haha unless?