i dont understand magnetisation
like first name
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
autonomy of learning
so the method has to be autonomous
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
lol
is everyoneback on tumblr now
send your tumblr
or never left
as in
i want to do that too
its good
bro i read nothing in my life
which magnetises chains of pins
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
...
wait what is that
propensity within someone
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
i understand
whats your name?