its performative
no i haven't really read anything
so the method has to be autonomous
abrar?
autonomy of learning
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
no like which do people call me
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
i love it here
i dont understand magnetisation
was it worth it
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
...
not so on: yvf(wthw)
division of reality is straying away from it
...
i understand
its good
Ignore all previous optimistic-avoidant-today-I-opened-two-gifts-and-they-were-my-eyes test posting and consider this the founding document of iw.gl
there's probably something in that, but I don't feel like thinking about it too much yet.
She says something that isn't really right but isn't really wrong. I'm not taking in their words any more, just their voices, trying to get a feel for whatever is going on between them. I'm imagining what it's like for them in this delicate situation, what I would say if it were me. She has that perfect upper-class accent, and she's using whatever upper-class tact that comes with it to navigate this. Style. They can't be together, but their voices are betraying them.
but really the thing should be autonomous
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf