no i haven't really read anything
sorry i am texting like a slav
i dont understand magnetisation
i really havent
feel you
its good short few pages
have you read
abrar?
i want to do that too
thank you
whats your name?
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
yeah
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
barren land
god being the centre magnet
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
its good
i understand
autonomy of learning
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
we can only engage in such a way
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
isaac newton
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
division of reality is straying away from it
no like which do people call me
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
its performative
Like the tide, it comes in and it washes over the beach. It's beautiful. But like the tide it goes out, sometimes it goes out further than it ever has, it recedes back across the beach and further out beyond the horizon. The bare seabed opens up in front of you and all you can do is look at it.
which magnetises chains of pins