there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
isaac
all that is to say
not their contents
i really havent
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
i understand
much more tactility
no i haven't really read anything
whats your name?
god being the centre magnet
plato
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
we can only engage in such a way
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
was it worth it
and the fake qualifier
you know who you are. no more time, not like
1
. way too specific.i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
Sun, 02 Nov 2025 21:54:03
is everyoneback on tumblr now
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 21:22:59
like magnets
or never left