amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
much more tactility
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
all that is to say
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
like first name
is this you as well
we can only engage in such a way
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
i want to do that too
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
so at the end
like magnets
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
its good
autonomy of learning
what do you think my name is
isaac
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
It's
dusk
in a snowy forest and I'm playing with a fox.no longer writing in the third person
Better Lift
plato