what do you mean
all that is to say
like magnets
have you read
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
not their contents
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
as in
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
its good
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
i understand
isaac newton
magnetises a pin
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
autonomy of learning
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
like first name
we can only engage in such a way
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
so an active mazelike process
much more tactility
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
the site i am dreaming