my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

its good

much more tactility

not their contents

i dont understand magnetisation

we need to be deconstructing our identities

propensity within someone

sorry i am texting like a slav

its good

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

its good short few pages

all that is to say

plato

plato

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

no like which do people call me

abrar?

Lift Analysis

not so on: yvf(wthw)

was it worth it

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

2 (actually index). two is company

i want to do that too

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

and the fake qualifier

The slug lives in my bathroom. I only see it in the early hours of the morning, when I'm not quite right.