i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

idk

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

so at the end

all that is to say

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

was it worth it

its performative

its good

what do you mean

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

i want to do that too

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

sorry i am texting like a slav

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

no like which do people call me

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

no i haven't really read anything

magnetisation/form

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

lol yea

i was tempted to lie about my name

Dreams like these are highly symbolic and emotionally intense. Here’s a breakdown of common interpretations:

Maybe, Jack, I'm doing this because I'm English?

plato

...

you cannot feed someone truth

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

plato