not so on: yvf(wthw)
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
ahnaf abrar
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
yeah
division of reality is straying away from it
not their contents
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
its performative
yeah
i have read not even 1 book
isaac newton
its good
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
feel you
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
that looks like my instagram account
send your tumblr
is this you as well
your feed looks like my tumblr
as in
lol
what do you think my name is
sorry i am texting like a slav
Thank you for telling me that I'm failing to see how I'm reproducing the dynamics I'm trying to critique by only describing my Korean colleague / fresh meat and the black girl in relation to others and myself.
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things