mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

send your tumblr

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

autonomy of learning

you cannot feed someone truth

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

division of reality is straying away from it

barren land

fw

I know that if I try to make this entry any more than it is I will ruin it.

lol

we can only engage in such a way

I'm trying to picture the scene inside, like I was trying to picture the scene in the tree.

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

so the method has to be autonomous

Better Lift

Thank you, Jack

that looks like my instagram account

what do you think my name is

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time