there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

magnetises a pin

ion

autonomy of learning

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

all that is to say

isaac

its performative

have you read

what do you mean

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

god being the centre magnet

we can only engage in such a way

its good

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

plato

not their contents

i dont understand magnetisation

plato

we need to be deconstructing our identities

i was tempted to lie about my name

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

so an active mazelike process

Thank you, Jack

And thank you for telling me that the manner in which the narrator consistently fails to act morally is really compelling. Fuck you.

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now