there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

division of reality is straying away from it

its performative

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

i love it here

much more tactility

plato

barren land

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

i dont understand magnetisation

magnetises a pin

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

lol yea

like first name

god being the centre magnet

its good

all that is to say

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

propensity within someone

have you read

Thank you for telling me that I'm failing to see how I'm reproducing the dynamics I'm trying to critique by only describing my Korean colleague / fresh meat and the black girl in relation to others and myself.

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

isaac