my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
I wonder if the birds knew I was watching?
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
I am below everything.
as in
barren land
all that is to say
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:38:49
i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me
propensity within someone
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
so an active mazelike process
magnetisation/form
it is hopeful
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
you have a beautiful account btw
much more tactility
Thank you, Jack
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
so i or you can author smaller fragments that get arranged