all that is to say
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
god being the centre magnet
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
we can only engage in such a way
autonomy of learning
like first name
no i haven't really read anything
i really havent
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
division of reality is straying away from it
its performative
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
yeah
not their contents
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
magnetises a pin
sorry i am texting like a slav
propensity within someone
no like which do people call me
i dont understand magnetisation
feel you
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
its good
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now