i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

i have read not even 1 book

we can only engage in such a way

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

Dreams like these are highly symbolic and emotionally intense. Here’s a breakdown of common interpretations:

plato

what do you mean

ion

its good short few pages

you cannot feed someone truth

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

no i haven't really read anything

sorry i am texting like a slav

so an active mazelike process

your feed looks like my tumblr

its performative

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

i dont understand magnetisation

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

We stand there laughing. The fireworks go off behind him.

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

all that is to say

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

its good

2 (actually index). two is company

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

Like the tide, it comes in and it washes over the beach. It's beautiful. But like the tide it goes out, sometimes it goes out further than it ever has, it recedes back across the beach and further out beyond the horizon. The bare seabed opens up in front of you and all you can do is look at it.

have you read

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

magnetisation/form

hello reader,

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

confused - is it the tide or its absense? I still like where I was going with it. anyway, real reader know this site is the note.

Slug

is everyoneback on tumblr now