much more tactility

you cannot feed someone truth

a lot of what i've been doing has been some imaginary screenshot or recording of his website, something that could be found within it

you have a beautiful account btw

i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it

Lift Analysis

so i or you can author smaller fragments that get arranged

what do you think my name is

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

i was tempted to lie about my name

as in

i really havent

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

magnetisation/form

the textwall is as much for me as it is for you

propensity within someone

but really the thing should be autonomous

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

which magnetises chains of pins

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

not their contents

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

its good

lol

yes