there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
so at the end
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
not their contents
i see a website though something that reconfigures or is mazelike
Lift Analysis
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
somewhere between instagram and chatgpt
but i respect your search
kind of mythopoesis
yes
wow, you are the first stranger to write a textwall to me
The studio designs some piece of media to perpetuate the marketable concept of Real London, while the real London is hollowed out by hollow bankers or whatever. Not pulling on that thread. But the yuppies don't mind because they're free to iterate on Real London without any competition from real London because it's too concerned with its slow eradication. And there's nice flats to live in now or whatever. The yuppies can begin to inhabit their Real London.
its good
sorry i am texting like a slav
god being the centre magnet