i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
we need to be deconstructing our identities
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
magnetisation/form
we can only engage in such a way
yeah
isaac newton
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
much more tactility
that looks like my instagram account
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
you cannot feed someone truth
no i haven't really read anything
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i love it here
propensity within someone
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
i want to do that too
which magnetises chains of pins
is this you as well
whats your name?
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
have you read
send your tumblr
i really havent
no like which do people call me