mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

They're fucking around with the box. I ask her what people do with fireworks for so long before they're ready to light. She doesn't know.

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

we can only engage in such a way

so the method has to be autonomous

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

so at the end

idk

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

so an active mazelike process

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

isaac

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

whats your name?

magnetises a pin

was it worth it

its good

thank you

was it worth it

send link