there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

i was tempted to lie about my name

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

Better Lift

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

yeah

you cannot feed someone truth

bro i read nothing in my life

no like which do people call me

whats your name?

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46

division of reality is straying away from it

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

was it worth it

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

which magnetises chains of pins