we can only engage in such a way

have you read

like magnets

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

its good

not their contents

isaac

its good

as in

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

I wonder if the birds knew I was watching?

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

It Will Get Lighter

you cannot feed someone truth

i see a website though something that reconfigures or is mazelike

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

all that is to say

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

its good short few pages

theres a kind of a cowardice to generative art that i want to avoid though. i want the kind of relationship to this thing that a game designer has to a game engine

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

autonomy of learning

so at the end

but really the thing should be autonomous

Better Lift

so an active mazelike process

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities