god being the centre magnet
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
your feed looks like my tumblr
i dont understand magnetisation
isaac
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
thank you
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
and the fake qualifier
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
its performative
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
much more tactility
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
sorry i am texting like a slav
the site i am dreaming
Hours staring at the ceiling, the wall, curling up into a ball. It seems annoyed with the light, it kind of recoils. It will get lighter. I wonder where it goes in the day.
and the fake qualifier
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
like magnets
not their contents
i really havent
you know who you are. no more time, not like
1
. way too specific.but it is in my head and am i compelled to realise it, so it is my silmarillion, my tempelos
we want to live the knowledge too live the content