i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

you cannot feed someone truth

your feed looks like my tumblr

that looks like my instagram account

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

all that is to say

we can only engage in such a way

autonomy of learning

propensity within someone

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

that is unstable and lets me operate in that discovery mode that i can create within and also produce works from.

Better Lift