there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i dont understand magnetisation
as in
propensity within someone
much more tactility
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
whats your name?
no i haven't really read anything
isaac
you cannot feed someone truth
barren land
its good
magnetisation/form
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
i love it here
have you read
idk
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
⚠️ Live Document Forever ⚠️
in a post. I want to be remembered
"Anyway, you're you. I mean, look at you!" she says. "You could get with anyone, anyone in the street. Really."
yes
I wonder if she knew I was down there listening? I wonder if she would've said something more true, more personal, more raw, more heartfelt, more harsh, more seductive, more freeing, more exposing, more risky, more romantic, more rude, more honest, more anything, if there hadn't been an audience.
which magnetises chains of pins