you cannot feed someone truth

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

not their contents

what do you mean

and the fake qualifier

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

autonomy of learning

or never left

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

like magnets

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

much more tactility

which magnetises chains of pins

i love it here

so at the end

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

lol yea

magnetisation/form

i really havent

isaac newton

        13       |
                |
                |
            H   |
                |
                |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
                |

i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak