brb i will read and reply sincerely
i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me
a version of this existed for a few months last year but it was static. it was HTML with writing and pictures and videos and sounds. i had this feeling that the code should be as important as the content, that structurally each piece in relation to each other piece shouldn't change, that the mazelike quality should emerge from me intricately arranging paths through it. like classic hypertext
magnetises a pin
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
so at the end
i understand
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
have you read
so an active mazelike process
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
you cannot feed someone truth
much more tactility
plato
its good
and the fake qualifier
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
lol yea
i really havent
send your tumblr
i love it here
lol
that is unstable and lets me operate in that discovery mode that i can create within and also produce works from.
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
as in
kind of mythopoesis