She says something that isn't really right but isn't really wrong. I'm not taking in their words any more, just their voices, trying to get a feel for whatever is going on between them. I'm imagining what it's like for them in this delicate situation, what I would say if it were me. She has that perfect upper-class accent, and she's using whatever upper-class tact that comes with it to navigate this. Style. They can't be together, but their voices are betraying them.
have you read
is everyoneback on tumblr now
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
idk
i have read not even 1 book
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
so at the end
that looks like my instagram account
its performative
lol yea
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
autonomy of learning
magnetisation/form
so an active mazelike process
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
hello reader,
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
like first name
its good short few pages
barren land
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
...
send link