was it worth it

or never left

much more tactility

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

and the fake qualifier

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

what do you mean

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

its good short few pages

idk

like magnets

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

feel you

no i haven't really read anything

ion

abrar?

something religious, a kind of complex,

it will get lighter

"Anyway, you're you. I mean, look at you!" she says. "You could get with anyone, anyone in the street. Really."

"Put a blanket."

hello reader,

"I'm only attracted to you", he replies. "Like, you only."

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book