there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
And thank you for telling me that the manner in which the narrator consistently fails to act morally is really compelling. Fuck you.
ion
we can only engage in such a way
division of reality is straying away from it
its good
magnetisation/form
have you read
all that is to say
so the method has to be autonomous
sorry i am texting like a slav
not their contents
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
barren land
plato
your feed looks like my tumblr
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
i was tempted to lie about my name
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
fw
is this you as well
feel you
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
or never left
its good
yeah
its good short few pages
send your tumblr
so an active mazelike process
magnetises a pin