something religious, a kind of complex,

it will get lighter

no like which do people call me

much more tactility

i have read not even 1 book

or never left

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

your feed looks like my tumblr

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

like first name

what do you mean

propensity within someone

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

thank you

its good

we need to be deconstructing our identities

yeah

so at the end

i understand

lol

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

what do you think my name is

and the fake qualifier

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

i was tempted to lie about my name

no longer writing in the third person

She says something that isn't really right but isn't really wrong. I'm not taking in their words any more, just their voices, trying to get a feel for whatever is going on between them. I'm imagining what it's like for them in this delicate situation, what I would say if it were me. She has that perfect upper-class accent, and she's using whatever upper-class tact that comes with it to navigate this. Style. They can't be together, but their voices are betraying them.