as in

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

all that is to say

that looks like my instagram account

much more tactility

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

so an active mazelike process

idk

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

propensity within someone

division of reality is straying away from it

its performative

not so on: yvf(wthw)

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

...

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

was it worth it

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

hello reader,

...

Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:27:13

Above and behind a window opens and a cigarette hangs out.

not their contents