yeah

so the method has to be autonomous

propensity within someone

ahnaf abrar

magnetises a pin

have you read

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

as in

division of reality is straying away from it

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

we need to be deconstructing our identities

plato

its good

isaac newton

i want to do that too

you cannot feed someone truth

all that is to say

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

what do you mean

the site i am dreaming

is this you as well

...

...

and the fake qualifier

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

not so on: yvf(wthw)

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

sorry i am texting like a slav

i really havent

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

Slug

Like the tide, it comes in and it washes over the beach. It's beautiful. But like the tide it goes out, sometimes it goes out further than it ever has, it recedes back across the beach and further out beyond the horizon. The bare seabed opens up in front of you and all you can do is look at it.

i love it here