After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting
and the fake qualifier
so the method has to be autonomous
isaac newton
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
its performative
autonomy of learning
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
its good
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
so at the end
god being the centre magnet
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
send your tumblr
i dont understand magnetisation
like magnets
⚠️ Live Document Forever ⚠️
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
propensity within someone
Lift Analysis