...

i really havent

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

you cannot feed someone truth

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

so the method has to be autonomous

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i love it here

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

its good short few pages

i want to do that too

with this post net clarity and the hours of nothing that followed I realise this is going to be awful.

sorry i am texting like a slav

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

in a post. I want to be remembered

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

She says something that isn't really right but isn't really wrong. I'm not taking in their words any more, just their voices, trying to get a feel for whatever is going on between them. I'm imagining what it's like for them in this delicate situation, what I would say if it were me. She has that perfect upper-class accent, and she's using whatever upper-class tact that comes with it to navigate this. Style. They can't be together, but their voices are betraying them.

we need to be deconstructing our identities

yeah

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

autonomy of learning

propensity within someone

"I'm only attracted to you", he replies. "Like, you only."

After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting

no like which do people call me

really i want the internet

i was tempted to lie about my name